Article Source
The article points out the hypocrisy of our leaders. The right or wrong
of it is not an issue in the article. None of our leaders would come out
smelling of roses if we examined their actions with the spite that is
shown to Putin. Not a fan f any of them but in this case he has been the
more reasonable of them. No invasion - a seceded state which had been
part of Russia in the not too distant past and which showed after the
anti Russian coup that they wanted to be absorbed once more - although
remaining independent in the majority of ways. Two thirds of the
Ukrainian military opted to join the Crimean army (changing sides. the
remaining third without harassment left the Crimea peacefully. No shock
and awe. We appear to be wanting a war. Nato needs a theatre of war for
its troops. Russia is being surrounded by missile sites so who could
expect Russia to stand back and see the Crimea and the warm water port
fall.Putin didn't suddenly become evil, he's always had his own agenda and
that has been quite apparent for some considerable time - What he has
done, has always been what has appeared to be realpolitik whilst
enriching himself to the tune of $40 billion (probably more, quite a lot
for a chap who has always been a public servant) If anyone thought
Putin could be easily influenced they were wrong, they can buy favours
obviously.
No comments:
Post a Comment